CloudStack 4.19.0.1 - Storage Capacity Allocation Checks Still Failing After Updating Disable Threshold, VM deployment and volume resize failing #14067
Unanswered
vishnuvs369
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
|
please check the global setting for volume resize, and the storage pool settings too |
0 replies
|
Thank you for the clarification. We checked the global setting for pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold, which was still set to 0.85 (85%). Since the current allocated capacity of the primary storage pool was already at approximately 84.96%, any additional allocation was causing the pool to be rejected. We updated: pool.storage.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold from 0.85 to 0.95. After updating this setting, both the VM deployment and volume resize operations are now working successfully. Thank you for pointing us in the right direction and for your support. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi CloudStack Team,
We are experiencing storage allocation checks failing despite increasing the storage capacity disable threshold. We would appreciate your guidance on whether there could be any cached or stale capacity values affecting the deployment and volume resize checks.
Environment
Current Storage State
As shown in the attached screenshots:
Configuration Change
We updated the following configuration:
pool.storage.capacity.disablethresholdChanged from the default 0.85 to 0.95
Confirmed using:
The value correctly shows 0.95 with
isdynamic=trueRestarted the Management Server after the change
capacity.check.periodremains at the default value of 5 minutesWaited more than 7 minutes before retesting
Confirmed that there is no cluster-level override for this configuration
Issues Observed
1. Volume Resize Failure
Resizing volume
ROOT-335still fails with the following error:Based on the current allocated capacity of 84.96%, this should be below the newly configured 95% disable threshold.
2. New VM Deployment Failure
Deploying a new VM also fails with:
For example:
336i-2-336-VMThis suggests that the deployment planner may also be rejecting all available hosts/storage pools within the cluster.
Troubleshooting Already Performed
pool.storage.capacity.disablethresholdis correctly set globally to0.95isdynamic=truecapacity.check.periodcycle before retestingCould you please advise whether there are any other capacity-related configurations, cached values, database entries, or capacity recalculation mechanisms that could cause CloudStack to continue using the previous threshold or reject the storage pool?
We have attached the relevant screenshots showing the current storage capacity and the errors encountered.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Best regards,
Vishnu
All reactions