[security-observability] Daily Security Observability Report — 2026-07-06 #43844
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Daily Security Observability Report. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #44089. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
The Daily Security Observability Report for 2026-07-06 analyzes 20 firewall-enabled workflow runs from the last 7 days across the
github/gh-awrepository. Firewall telemetry from 17 sandbox sessions reveals a healthy posture with a low 1.3% block rate (12 blocked out of 899 total requests). Two distinct domains were blocked:proxy.golang.org(Go module proxy, 3 blocks) andawmg-mcpg(internal MCP gateway, 9 blocks), both consistent with expected policy enforcement — neither represents external threat activity.The DIFC integrity-filtering system recorded zero filtered events in the last 7 days, indicating either no integrity/secrecy policy violations occurred or the filtered-integrity log collection timed out. The cached DIFC snapshot from
2026-06-23T16:50:31Zis 13 days old and was treated as stale; fresh collection also returned no events. This is a positive signal — the agentic workflows are operating within their configured integrity boundaries.No cross-cutting concerns were identified between the two signals; no workflow appeared in both firewall block lists and DIFC filtering simultaneously.
🔥 Firewall Analysis
Key Firewall Metrics
📈 Firewall Request Trends
Firewall activity peaked on 2026-07-06, accounting for the majority of observed requests (469 allowed, 9 blocked), consistent with a high-volume day of workflow executions. Earlier dates (2026-06-27 and 2026-06-30) show moderate traffic with minimal blocking. The block rate has remained consistently low (under 2%) across all observed days, indicating a stable and well-tuned allowlist policy.
Top Blocked Domains
Two domains account for all 12 blocked requests:
awmg-mcpg(9 blocks, the internal MCP gateway host) andproxy.golang.org(3 blocks, the Go module proxy). Theawmg-mcpgblocks are expected as agent sandboxes should not be directly accessing the MCP gateway host via the outbound proxy. Theproxy.golang.orgblocks indicate Go build or module fetch attempts from within the agent sandbox, which should be allowlisted if Go development workflows are expected.Most Frequently Blocked Domains
View Detailed Request Patterns by Workflow
Allowed traffic by domain:
View Complete Blocked Domains List
awmg-mcpg(9 blocks — internal MCP gateway, expected policy block)proxy.golang.org(3 blocks — Go module proxy, not in current allowlist)🔒 Firewall Security Recommendations
Add
proxy.golang.orgto the allowlist if Go development workflows (e.g., Daily Formal Spec Verifier) need to fetch Go modules during execution. This domain is blocked 3 times and causes potential build failures. Consider also addingsum.golang.organdstorage.googleapis.comwhich are typically needed alongsideproxy.golang.org.Investigate
awmg-mcpgdirect access attempts from agent sandboxes. The internal MCP gateway should only be accessed via the designated DIFC proxy, not directly through the outbound firewall proxy. Review the Test Quality Sentinel baseline configurations to ensure MCP is properly routed.Verify
api.pi.aiallowlist entry — the Pi AI endpoint is allowlisted but no traffic was observed in this period. If this endpoint is no longer used, consider removing it to reduce the attack surface.Review historical block spike — the cached historical data shows a large blocking event on 2026-06-22 (8,345 blocked, likely Google API/browser automation domains). Ensure any browser-based workflows are running in appropriately configured sandboxes with their own allowlist profiles.
🔒 DIFC Integrity Analysis
Key DIFC Metrics
📈 DIFC Events Over Time
No DIFC integrity-filtered events were recorded in the last 7 days. This may reflect genuine policy compliance across all agentic runs, or the DIFC integrity log collector may have timed out before completing its scan (the
filtered_integrityquery exceeded the 60-second timeout). The cached DIFC snapshot is from 2026-06-23 and was treated as stale (> 7 days).🔧 Top Filtered Tools
No tools triggered DIFC filtering in the analysis window.
🏷️ Filter Reasons and Tags
No integrity or secrecy tag violations were recorded. The DIFC system appears to be functioning but may require log collection configuration review given the timeout encountered.
📋 Per-Workflow DIFC Breakdown
📋 Per-Server DIFC Breakdown
👤 Per-User DIFC Breakdown
💡 DIFC Tuning Recommendations
Investigate DIFC log collection timeout — the
filtered_integritylogs query timed out (60s), preventing fresh DIFC data collection. Consider increasing the timeout or reducing the collection window to avoid missing data in future reports.Update the DIFC cache snapshot — the cached snapshot is 13 days old (2026-06-23), exceeding the 7-day freshness window. The next successful run should update the cache at
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/security-observability/filtered-logs.snapshot.json.Confirm DIFC coverage — validate that all 20 firewall-enabled workflows analyzed also have DIFC coverage enabled. A zero-event result with no timeout on collection would be a strong positive signal, but a timeout makes it ambiguous.
Cross-correlate with historical data — the previous DIFC snapshot from 2026-06-23 also showed 0 runs, suggesting either this is a period of true compliance or the collection mechanism has been consistently failing. Investigate the DIFC log pipeline health.
Generated by the Daily Security Observability workflow (consolidated from Daily Firewall Reporter + Daily DIFC Analyzer)
Analysis window: Last 7 days | Repository: github/gh-aw
Run: https://github.com/github/gh-aw/actions/runs/28808028246
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions