Skip to content

chore(release): candidate v1.7.2 - #393

Closed
mega-maxwell[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/release-candidate-1.7.2
Closed

mega-maxwell[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/release-candidate-1.7.2

Conversation

@mega-maxwell

@mega-maxwell mega-maxwell Bot commented Sep 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Release candidate v1.7.2 (was 1.7.1).

Merging this PR creates the release branch release-v1.7.2 at the merge commit.

It creates no tag; the tag is cut once, at settlement, by release-settle → release-publish.

Changelog: this release's entry drafted under ## v1.7.2 (settle stamps the date on the release branch);
previous release's entry synced from its tag: replaced.

@mega-maxwell

mega-maxwell Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Claude review status

Living comment — rewritten in place. The review workflow keeps this single comment up to date instead of posting a new one each round, so it always describes the latest reviewed commit and the earlier text is intentionally gone. No reply is needed here; reply to a finding in its own review thread, and answer an open question in a reply on this PR. The next review round reconciles your answer.

⏭️ Review skipped

Not reviewing head c01acc3d · updated 2026-09-30T01:52:09+00:00

This pull request is not a review target: opened by mega-maxwell[bot], the reviewer's own identity. No review round runs for it. Anything listed below is from an earlier round.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🧬 Mutation testing — ✅ PASS

Nothing to test — no mutants were generated on the changed lines.

@Troublor Troublor closed this Sep 30, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🧬 Mutation testing

No results at target/mutants/mutants.out — nothing was mutated (e.g. no mutatable changes).

@mega-maxwell
mega-maxwell Bot deleted the chore/release-candidate-1.7.2 branch September 30, 2026 01:47
@codspeed

codspeed Bot commented Sep 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ 16 benchmarks measured no execution time

Nothing ran under measurement, usually because the compiler removed the code under test. These results are not comparable, so they count as unchanged.

Preventing compiler optimizations

✅ 385 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 44 archived benchmarks run1

Performance Changes

Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
⚠️ estimated_da_size[0] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ estimated_da_size[1000] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ estimated_da_size[180] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ estimated_da_size[68] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ tx_size[0] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ tx_size[1000] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ tx_size[180] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ tx_size[68] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ estimated_da_size[0] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ estimated_da_size[1000] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ estimated_da_size[180] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ estimated_da_size[68] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ tx_size[0] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ tx_size[1000] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ tx_size[180] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ tx_size[68] < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A

Comparing chore/release-candidate-1.7.2 (c01acc3) with main (17ca265)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 44 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant