Skip to content

Bad Accuracy #9

Description

@LiTangCherry
  • RivaGAN version:
  • Python version: 3.6
  • Operating System: Ubuntu18.04

Hi, I trained the model with hollywood2 according to the guideline. But I only get an accuracy of 74% when there is no modification. Did I miss anything? Thank you!

Li

Activity

  1. 2459122312 commented on Nov 23, 2022

    @2459122312

    Hello,I have some problem when i try to use anaconda to repeat experiment.The Makefile can't be implemented successfully.
    Could you please share your idea?Thank you!

  2. xbtzpx commented on May 24, 2023

    @xbtzpx
    • RivaGAN version:
    • Python version: 3.6
    • Operating System: Ubuntu18.04

    Hi, I trained the model with hollywood2 according to the guideline. But I only get an accuracy of 74% when there is no modification. Did I miss anything? Thank you!

    Li

    Could you tell me if you have successfully reproduced the code? The author mentioned that both "Moments in Time" and "Hollywood2" datasets are quite large. Do you need to download both datasets? Could you provide your contact information so that I can reach out to you?

  3. MakrisJr commented on Jul 10, 2023

    @MakrisJr

    Which branch is everyone using? the master one is missing things e.g., the data folder. I didn't manage to "git checkout stable"
    or "make install" either

  4. llbbcc commented on Feb 23, 2024

    @llbbcc

    Maybe it is because Hollywood2 is too small.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions