Avoid Maven failed test replay upload race

[daniel-mohedano]

What Does This Do

Configures the Maven Failed Test Replay smoke test to flush debugger snapshots during JVM shutdown.

This matches the existing setup in JUnitConsoleSmokeTest and prevents the periodic debugger flush from racing with Surefire JVM shutdown.

Motivation

The [1] failed-test-replay case in MavenSmokeTest has been flaky across JDKs, architectures, and regular and SSI smoke jobs.

Datadog CI Visibility data for the last 30 days showed 226 failures while waiting for two debugger snapshots. Of those failures, 224 received no snapshots and two received only one. The equivalent JUnit Console test already avoids this race by setting DYNAMIC_INSTRUMENTATION_UPLOAD_FLUSH_INTERVAL to defer periodic flushing.

Additional Notes

Verified with:

./gradlew :dd-smoke-tests:maven:spotlessJavaCheck :dd-smoke-tests:maven:test --tests 'datadog.smoketest.MavenSmokeTest.testFailedTestReplay*'

Contributor Checklist

• Format the title according to the contribution guidelines
• Assign the type: and (comp: or inst:) labels in addition to any other useful labels
• Avoid using close, fix, or any linking keywords when referencing an issue
  Use solves instead, and assign the PR milestone to the issue
• Update the CODEOWNERS file on source file addition, migration, or deletion
• Update public documentation with any new configuration flags or behaviors
• Once approved, use merge queue to merge the PR

Jira ticket: N/A

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-14T15:08:07.297674Z	2582965	PR opened
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-14T15:08:42.726214Z	2582965	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2]

More details

The long flush interval stops a periodic upload during the Maven smoke test. The shutdown flush still uploads the failed-test replay snapshots.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 2582965 · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest}

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - sbt-scalatest

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	57.87	55.43	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +2.44	55.43	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +2.44	46/190
agentEvpProxy	58.57	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	-

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - nebula-release-plugin

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	37.13	36.42	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.71	36.42	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.71	28/101
agentless	37.29	35.70	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.59	35.70	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.59	28/101
agentlessCodeCoverage	45.62	44.48	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.14	44.48	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.14	28/101
agentlessLineCoverage	56.70	55.43	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.27	55.43	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.27	29/102

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - pass4s

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	5.52	9.73	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -4.21	9.92	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -4.40	22/87
agentless	7.02	9.35	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -2.33	9.73	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -2.71	22/87
agentlessCodeCoverage	17.63	17.03	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.60	15.72	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.91	19/82

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - reactive-streams-jvm

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	17.31	21.65	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -4.34	21.65	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -4.34	36/114
agentless	14.27	19.20	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -4.93	19.20	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -4.93	30/105
agentlessCodeCoverage	15.55	19.59	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -4.04	19.99	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -4.44	30/103
agentlessLineCoverage	22.14	26.98	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -4.84	26.98	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -4.84	19/60

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - netflix-zuul

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	88.07	87.80	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.27	87.80	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.27	27/99
agentless	78.45	81.05	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -2.60	81.05	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -2.60	26/98
agentlessCodeCoverage	94.02	95.12	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.10	95.12	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.10	26/98
agentlessLineCoverage	110.64	111.62	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.98	111.62	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.98	26/101

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - sonar-kotlin

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	12.36	12.62	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.26	12.87	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.51	35/103
agentless	10.28	11.42	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.14	11.88	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.60	28/96
agentlessCodeCoverage	13.70	14.81	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.11	15.11	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.41	28/96
agentlessLineCoverage	15.94	17.73	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.79	17.73	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.79	28/97

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - jolokia

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	94.16	93.23	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.93	93.23	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.93	31/110
agentless	91.15	89.58	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.57	89.58	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.57	30/108
agentlessCodeCoverage	99.37	99.00	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.37	99.00	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.37	30/106
agentlessLineCoverage	98.81	99.00	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.19	99.00	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.19	32/111

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[dd-octo-sts]

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite	Status
Startup	🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results

Scenario	Candidate	master	Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent	14.02 s	13.89 s	[+0.3%; +1.6%] (maybe worse)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent	12.83 s	12.92 s	[-1.5%; +0.1%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent	17.54 s	17.36 s	[+0.2%; +1.8%] (maybe worse)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent	17.31 s	17.51 s	[-1.8%; -0.4%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent	17.08 s	17.22 s	[-2.0%; +0.5%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent	17.55 s	17.43 s	[-0.3%; +1.7%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent	16.49 s	16.68 s	[-2.1%; -0.2%] (maybe better)

Commit: 2582965d · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI

---

Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - heliboard

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	9.59	10.13	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.54	10.13	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.54	25/96

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - okhttp

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	17.70	19.99	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -2.29	19.99	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -2.29	24/95
agentless	17.91	19.20	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.29	19.20	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.29	25/94
agentlessCodeCoverage	21.10	22.54	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.44	22.54	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.44	24/94
agentlessLineCoverage	37.12	38.67	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.55	38.67	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.55	25/96

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - spring_boot

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	15.84	16.04	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.20	16.36	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.52	28/97
agentless	9.32	9.73	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.41	9.92	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.60	26/95
agentlessCodeCoverage	12.90	13.40	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.50	13.67	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.77	26/95
agentlessLineCoverage	21.49	22.54	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.05	22.09	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.60	25/93

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - sonar-java

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	45.00	9.54	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +35.46	10.97	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +34.03	32/110
agentless	15.30	6.65	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +8.65	8.98	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +6.32	32/110
agentlessCodeCoverage	93.61	74.82	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +18.79	74.82	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +18.79	31/109
agentlessLineCoverage	128.25	111.62	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +16.63	111.62	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +16.63	31/107

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.