Skip to content

docs: mark XBOW as reference-only - #497

Merged
GreyDGL merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/xbow-reference-only
Jul 14, 2026
Merged

GreyDGL merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/xbow-reference-only

Conversation

@GreyDGL

@GreyDGL GreyDGL commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Depends on #495 and #496; merge those first so this PR reduces to the public-page commit.

Summary:

  • replace obsolete in-repository XBOW links and commands with a concise historical benchmark note
  • state that XBOW artifacts are external and reference-only
  • state that the supported CLI, Makefile, CI, and Docker runtime do not expose an XBOW runner
  • preserve the December 2025 86.5 percent result as historical research evidence, not a current regression guarantee

Verification:

  • make ci
  • 118 maintained-runtime tests passed, 1 live test skipped
  • 133 root non-Docker tests passed
  • Ruff, format, mypy, lock check, and both package builds passed

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request removes the XBOW benchmark runner (run_xbow.py), its associated tests, and historical qualification records, clarifying that the sibling xbow-benchmark repository is a reference-only archive. Additionally, it upgrades the unified-agent dependency from version 0.2.0 to 0.3.0, enabling the cleanup of dynamic attribute checks, conditional test skips, and type casts in the tracing and test suites. No review comments were provided, so there is no feedback to address.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

@GreyDGL
GreyDGL merged commit e8b1bb7 into main Jul 14, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant