Skip to content

URL Checker: resolve failure checking PLY documentation - #4004

Open
jsiirola wants to merge 1 commit into
Pyomo:mainfrom
jsiirola:url-check-update
Open

URL Checker: resolve failure checking PLY documentation#4004
jsiirola wants to merge 1 commit into
Pyomo:mainfrom
jsiirola:url-check-update

Conversation

@jsiirola

@jsiirola jsiirola commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes # .

Summary/Motivation:

The URL checker has started failing for the PLY documentation page due to a certificate trust issue. This switches the URL from https to http to avoid that failure.

Changes proposed in this PR:

  • use http instead of https for PLY documentation

AI-Use Disclosure

  • AI tools were NOT used during the preparation of this PR

or

  • AI tools contributed to the development of this PR

    • AI tools generated documentation (including the PR description/comments, code comments, and/or Sphinx documentation)
    • AI tools generated tests (baselines, examples, and/or code)
    • AI tools generated code (apart from tests)

    Review process (select ONE):

    • Rewritten: All AI-generated content was rewritten by me before being committed.
    • Reviewed/verified: I retained AI-generated content and verified it before committing. Verification included (as applicable):
      • Ran the code and fixed issues
      • Added and ran tests
      • Checked correctness/logic of code and tests
      • Checked for alignment with the contribution guide
      • Considered security implications
    • As-is: AI-generated content was commited directly to the repository

Notes for reviewers (optional):

Legal Acknowledgement

By contributing to this software project, I have read the contribution guide and agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution:

  1. I agree my contributions are submitted under the BSD license.
  2. I represent I am authorized to make the contributions and grant the license. If my employer has rights to intellectual property that includes these contributions, I represent that I have received permission to make contributions and grant the required license on behalf of that employer.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.66%. Comparing base (b953cf9) to head (8ea8fe7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4004      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.13%   89.66%   -0.48%     
==========================================
  Files         917      917              
  Lines      109101   109101              
==========================================
- Hits        98343    97828     -515     
- Misses      10758    11273     +515     
Flag Coverage Δ
builders 29.09% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
default 86.13% <ø> (?)
expensive 35.07% <ø> (?)
linux 72.34% <ø> (-17.30%) ⬇️
linux_other 72.34% <ø> (-15.33%) ⬇️
oldsolvers 27.91% <ø> (-0.12%) ⬇️
osx 83.11% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
win ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants