For some time, the sqlite module for Python3 has supported retrieving datetime fields from sqlite as datetime.datetime python objects.
If I do a call via a function direct to the database using the native sqlite module I am returned datetime.datetime objects.
If I do a call to the same function as part of a bottle view via bottle-sqlite, I'm returned strings in the format %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.
It would be ideal if this module returned python datetime() rather than str(). This issue means that I currently have to have two near-identical functions - one that handles the string type and the other that handles the correct type.
For some time, the sqlite module for Python3 has supported retrieving datetime fields from sqlite as
datetime.datetimepython objects.If I do a call via a function direct to the database using the native sqlite module I am returned
datetime.datetimeobjects.If I do a call to the same function as part of a bottle view via bottle-sqlite, I'm returned strings in the format
%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.It would be ideal if this module returned python
datetime()rather thanstr(). This issue means that I currently have to have two near-identical functions - one that handles the string type and the other that handles the correct type.