Support cached properties - #38
Conversation
|
@rixx – could you rebase this over |
241416a to
f8b5f27
Compare
|
@ghickman done, but with the other PR reverted, cached properties now land in both methods and properties, as this was leaning on the callable check more than I realised (would have put it in the same PR). Do you want me to add |
|
I'm pushing a change to tests that checks that attributes are not present multiple times in the classify output. This will turn the test suite red so this PR does not get accidentally merged while it's in this state. Looking at |
No description provided.