Document organization and project spending caps

[dcruzeneil2]

summary

• add a dedicated spending caps guide under info
• compare organization and project cap accounting, scope, and use cases
• document the 80% warning, 100% pause, monthly reset, layered behavior, and enforcement caveats
• use native cards, comparison tables, and step flows instead of a dashboard screenshot that can drift
• link the guide from pricing, projects, and the docs navigation

testing

• mint validate
• mint broken-links
• rendered /info/spending-caps locally in chromium
• git diff --check main...HEAD

[mintlify]

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
Kernel	🟢 Ready	View Preview	Aug 27, 2026, 3:31 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

[cursor]

Stale comment

Risk assessment: Very Low (re-evaluated after push)

Previous approval remains in effect. This run does not re-approve.

Verified from the current diff only (4 files, +151 / −0 vs main; 1-line change since the prior approval on ab83382).

What changed (full PR)

• New Mintlify page info/spending-caps.mdx (product docs for organization vs project spending caps)
• One nav entry in docs.json (info/spending-caps)
• Two cross-links from existing docs (info/pricing.mdx, info/projects.mdx)

What changed since last approval

• In info/spending-caps.mdx, the limited-preview note now uses a mailto:support@kernel.sh link instead of /info/support. Still documentation-only.

Why this remains Very Low

• Documentation-only on a docs site; no application logic, APIs, auth, billing enforcement, CI, or infrastructure
• docs.json change is a sidebar path addition, not runtime/infra config
• No CODEOWNERS file and branch ruleset has require_code_owner_review: false
• Risk did not increase, so the existing approval is not dismissed

No production codepaths or shared systems are modified.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}

[cursor]

Stale comment

Risk assessment: Very Low (re-evaluated after push)

Previous approval remains in effect. This run does not re-approve.

Verified from the current diff only (4 files, +156 / −0 vs main).

What changed (full PR)

• New Mintlify page info/spending-caps.mdx (product docs for organization vs project spending caps)
• One nav entry in docs.json (info/spending-caps)
• Two cross-links from existing docs (info/pricing.mdx, info/projects.mdx)

What changed since last approval (ab83382 → eb4fc50)

• Availability note in info/spending-caps.mdx now splits organization vs project preview access and uses a mailto:support@kernel.sh request link. Still documentation-only.

Why this remains Very Low

• Documentation-only on a docs site; no application logic, APIs, auth, billing enforcement, CI, or infrastructure
• docs.json change is a sidebar path addition, not runtime/infra config
• No CODEOWNERS file in the repo
• Risk did not increase, so the existing approval is not dismissed

No production codepaths or shared systems are modified.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}

[cursor]

Risk assessment: Very Low (re-evaluated after push)

Previous approval remains in effect. This run does not re-approve.

Verified from the current diff only (4 files, +177 / −0 vs main).

What changed (full PR)

• New Mintlify page info/spending-caps.mdx (product docs for organization vs project spending caps)
• One nav entry in docs.json (info/spending-caps)
• Two cross-links from existing docs (info/pricing.mdx, info/projects.mdx)

What changed since last assessment (eb4fc50 → b639f53)

• Organization and project cards in info/spending-caps.mdx now use inline SVGs instead of named icon strings. Cosmetic docs markup only.

Why this remains Very Low

• Documentation-only on a docs site; no application logic, APIs, auth, billing enforcement, CI, or infrastructure
• docs.json change is a sidebar path addition, not runtime/infra config
• No CODEOWNERS file in the repo
• Risk did not increase, so the existing approval is not dismissed

No production codepaths or shared systems are modified.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}