Skip to content

New release version #91

Open
Open

Description

@corburn

It's been a few years since the 1.0.0 release with many changes since. Is it possible to cut a stable release? I like the addition of the the Digester interface.

Activity

  1. AkihiroSuda commented on Sep 20, 2023

    @AkihiroSuda
    Member

    SGTM, cc @opencontainers/go-digest-maintainers PTAL

  2. thaJeztah commented on Sep 20, 2023

    @thaJeztah
    Member

    overall SGTM; there's one thing I was wondering the other day; when I made my PR (some time ago) to register the default algorithms automatically, that also included sha384 (as it "came with the package"), however the OCI spec doesn't list it (I think; on my phone right now), so I wonder if we should register it by default, or somehow make it optional;

    RegisterAlgorithm(SHA384, crypto.SHA384)

  3. thaJeztah commented on Sep 20, 2023

    @thaJeztah
    Member

    (basically; it's easier to add these things, than to remove, once released)

  4. corburn commented on Jan 4, 2024

    @corburn
    Author

    @thaJeztah agreed a future release could add registering SHA384 by default.

  5. thaJeztah commented on Jan 30, 2024

    @thaJeztah
    Member

    Hm, ok, so I had my wires crossed, and thought that before 084376b, the SHA-384 was not registered, but it already was (but could not be used by default, unless "crypto/sha512" was imported.

    So removing SHA384 would be a breaking change (and require a major version bump (V2); #97 (comment)

    I did open a PR to somewhat improve docs (recommended use / not use);

    And perhaps we should indeed consider to remove the "not recommended" algorithms from the default for a V2.0 (don't register SHA-512 and SHA-384 by default, and don't import "crypto/sha512")

  6. nimengliusha commented on May 15, 2025

    @nimengliusha

    It's been a few years since the 1.0.0 release with many changes since. Is it possible to cut a stable release?

  7. marked New release version #109 as a duplicate of this issue on Jun 15, 2026
  8. kimdre commented on Jul 29, 2026

    @kimdre

    Can we expect a new release at some point?

  9. AkihiroSuda commented on Jul 29, 2026

    @AkihiroSuda
    Member
  10. IceCodeNew commented on Aug 25, 2026

    @IceCodeNew

    Let's make a release after merging

    Hi there, just in case you missed that, the two PRs blocking a new release was already merged. May we have a new release to celebrate this year? ;-)

  11. AkihiroSuda commented on Aug 25, 2026

    @AkihiroSuda
    Member

    I want this one as well before releasing it

  12. mvdan commented on Oct 12, 2026

    @mvdan
    Contributor

    My 2c would be to do a release soon and not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. So many Go projects out there still use v1.0.0 due to how Go's "latest version" works by default, and that version is extremely out of date at this point :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions