Verify stream completion on clean EOF in the reconnecting framed reader - #3564
Verify stream completion on clean EOF in the reconnecting framed reader#3564alangenfeld wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
A clean EOF was trusted as genuine end-of-stream. In production the server's v3 max-duration abort is normalized into a graceful EOF on the way to the client, so long-lived reads ended silently at the 2-minute connection cap: zero reconnects across all reads org-wide, with read completions clustering at exactly 120s. A completed stream cut mid-body had the same shape - a clean EOF short of the tail. On EOF the reader now consults streams.getInfo and treats the EOF as a cut unless the stream is done AND the frames delivered cover every chunk up to the tail, reconnecting from the next chunk exactly like an errored connection. A metadata failure falls back to trusting the EOF so a transient blip cannot fail a healthy completion. Negative-startIndex (tail) reads keep their single-shot behavior. Signed-off-by: Alex Langenfeld <alex.langenfeld@vercel.com>
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 5daa34b The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
🧪 E2E Test Results✅ All tests passed 🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.
E2E Test SummarySummary
Details by Category✅ ▲ Vercel Production
✅ 💻 Local Development
✅ 📦 Local Production
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
✅ 🪟 Windows
✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance
✅ vercel-multi-region
|
📊 Workflow Benchmarkscommit Backend:
Streams
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)1020 steps (inline) Cumulative STSO time: main 440013ms → this run 417847ms (Δ -22166ms, -5%) 1020 steps (queue-hop) Cumulative STSO time: main 2925ms → this run 2072ms (Δ -853ms, -29%) 📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max): RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max): Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max): 📜 Previous results (1)6e2b0a5Fri, 14 Aug 2026 22:18:17 GMT · run logs
Streams
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodologyStreams: writer/reader sustained rates (steady window, 10% trimmed each side), first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach. The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it) Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t 🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600 All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor. |
Sim WorldSimulated world deterministic testing for races. Traces 🟠 Mint-ordered log — 3 fail of 41 total
Full trace: 🟢 Append-only log — 0 fail of 41 total
Full trace: |
Signed-off-by: Alex Langenfeld <alex.langenfeld@vercel.com>
2 participants
Summary & Motivation
Long live reads were ending silently at the server's 2-minute connection cap: the max-duration abort reaches the client as a clean EOF on some transport paths, and the reader read that as end-of-stream. On EOF it now consults
streams.getInfoand reconnects from the next chunk unless the stream is done and every chunk up to the tail was delivered. A failed metadata read trusts the EOF, so a transient blip can't fail a healthy completion.Test Plan
Tests added for the reconnect, verified-completion, metadata-failure, and reconnect-budget paths.