Skip to content

[core] Retain workflow VMs across hooks - #3576

Draft
NathanColosimo wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/replay-lazy-source-bundlesfrom
codex/retain-vm-with-hooks
Draft

[core] Retain workflow VMs across hooks#3576
NathanColosimo wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/replay-lazy-source-bundlesfrom
codex/retain-vm-with-hooks

Conversation

@NathanColosimo

@NathanColosimo NathanColosimo commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • retain a workflow VM across safe step boundaries that also contain hooks
  • generation-guard step and hook suspension signals so stale callbacks cannot demote a resumed session
  • include hook metadata and abort-reason serialization in the same passivity gate as step inputs
  • replay hook-only, wait, attribute, unsafe-serialization, and WORKFLOW_RETAINED_VM=0 boundaries

Why

Spec 6 event logs are monotone prefixes. A hook_received event that lands after the VM consumed its prefix extends that prefix on the next delta without invalidating the retained session, so an open hook does not itself require replay.

Retention still requires a step boundary. Inline step bodies keep awaiting an accepted step_started ownership claim when an open hook can wake a competing invocation, and resume keeps the existing exact-prefix extension check.

Verification

  • pnpm --filter @workflow/core test — 2,124 passed, 3 expected failures
  • pnpm typecheck — 43 tasks passed
  • pnpm turbo build --filter=@workflow/core... — 7 tasks passed
  • pnpm lint — passed with baseline advisory diagnostics
  • pnpm changeset status --since=origin/codex/replay-lazy-source-bundles

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workbench-nestjs-workflow Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workbench-python-workflow Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview Aug 15, 2026 6:18am

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: a2bbf72

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
Name Type
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/web Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

⚠️ Flaky E2E Tests (passed on retry)

These tests failed at least once and passed on a retry. A recurring entry here is a real race worth investigating.

  • startFromWorkflow - calling start() directly inside a workflow function with hook communication (nest)

🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)

Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.

  • run-pickup-stall · addTenWorkflow (tanstack-start) · at 06:19:11Z · abandoned wrun_01M0215KWW8NB4MG3KVVE172KT
  • run-pickup-stall · deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds (tanstack-start) · at 06:20:03Z · abandoned wrun_01M02176BBH279TB3CT77Q9PQY
  • run-pickup-stall · addTenWorkflow (vite) · at 06:20:13Z · abandoned wrun_01M0217FZJ0584HTEZF1R5H7S6
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (tanstack-start) · at 06:20:36Z · abandoned wrun_01M02186A6VPJ9JD180PVF213Y
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (vite) · at 06:21:22Z · abandoned wrun_01M0219KE3JR00Y9W5FN2WAZK2
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAnyWorkflow (tanstack-start) · at 06:21:29Z · abandoned wrun_01M0219T46T1A9PQ6G4S1RCVVN

E2E Test Summary

Summary
Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 3474 0 738 4212
✅ 💻 Local Development 3380 0 520 3900
✅ 📦 Local Production 3810 0 558 4368
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 3810 0 558 4368
✅ 🪟 Windows 312 0 0 312
✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance 9 0 128 137
✅ vercel-multi-region 27 0 0 27
Total 14822 0 2502 17324
Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-node 128 0 28
✅ astro-quickjs 128 0 28
✅ example-node 128 0 28
✅ example-quickjs 128 0 28
✅ express-node 128 0 28
✅ express-quickjs 128 0 28
✅ fastify-node 128 0 28
✅ fastify-quickjs 128 0 28
✅ hono-node 128 0 28
✅ hono-quickjs 128 0 28
✅ nest-node 128 0 28
✅ nest-quickjs 128 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 153 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 153 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-node 153 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-quickjs 153 0 3
✅ nitro-node 128 0 28
✅ nitro-quickjs 128 0 28
✅ nuxt-node 128 0 28
✅ nuxt-quickjs 128 0 28
✅ python-node 8 0 148
✅ sveltekit-node 147 0 9
✅ sveltekit-quickjs 147 0 9
✅ tanstack-start-node 128 0 28
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 128 0 28
✅ vite-node 128 0 28
✅ vite-quickjs 128 0 28

✅ 💻 Local Development

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 137 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 156 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 137 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 156 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 156 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 149 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 149 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 130 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 130 0 26

✅ 📦 Local Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 137 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 137 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 156 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 156 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 137 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 137 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 156 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 156 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 149 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 149 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 130 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 130 0 26

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 137 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 137 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 156 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 156 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 137 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 137 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 156 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 156 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 149 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 149 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 130 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 130 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 130 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 130 0 26

✅ 🪟 Windows

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 156 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 156 0 0

✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ python 9 0 128

✅ vercel-multi-region

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 27 0 0

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit a2bbf72 · Sat, 15 Aug 2026 06:37:21 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 124 (-45%) 💚 1152 🔴 (±0%) 1199 🔴 (-1.0%) 1273 🔴 (-6.1%) 30
TTFS stream 1095 (+366%) 🔻 1142 🔴 (-4.4%) 1147 🔴 (-9.4%) 1664 🔴 (+23%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 1378 (+231%) 🔻 1450 🔴 (+1.7%) 1499 🔴 (+3.0%) 1841 🔴 (+19%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 886 (-33%) 💚 1196 (-53%) 💚 1203 (-55%) 💚 2090 (-35%) 💚 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 10016 (-7.8%) 12025 (-89%) 💚 13776 (-93%) 💚 14352 (-92%) 💚 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 125 (-19%) 💚 396 (-20%) 💚 426 (-24%) 💚 476 (-39%) 💚 1018
STSO 1020 steps (queue-hop) 2325 2325 2325 2325 1
WO 1020 steps 353253 (-15%) 353253 (-15%) 353253 (-15%) 353253 (-15%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 86 (-11%) 117 (-25%) 💚 134 (-43%) 💚 164 (-43%) 💚 28

Streams

Scenario wr c/s rd c/s wr KiB/s rd KiB/s CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 100 (±0%) 100 (-2%) 5 (±0%) 5 (-2%) 99.5 (-26%) 126 (-58%) 155 (-85%) 269 (-82%) 123 (-41%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 100 (±0%) 101 (+1%) 334 (±0%) 336 (+1%) 97.5 (-16%) 160 (-53%) 388 (-49%) 1097 (-13%) 154 (-51%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 89.2 (±0%) 89.2 (±0%) 16.2 (±0%) 16.2 (-1%) 91 (-9%) 116 (-17%) 151 (-22%) 649 (-26%) 216 (-40%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 54.7 (±0%) 54.7 (±0%) 355 (±0%) 355 (±0%) 95 (-43%) 124 (-30%) 183 (-79%) 738 (-80%) 586 (-70%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 109 (±0%) 109 (+1%) 710 (±0%) 711 (+1%) 100 (-21%) 139 (-52%) 180 (-73%) 362 (-81%) 262 (-74%) 3
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)

1020 steps (inline)

Cumulative STSO time: main 413585ms → this run 350822ms (Δ -62763ms, -15%)

  100-150 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   8    +8
  150-200 ms  █┃████                    main  69  this  25   -44
  200-250 ms  █████┃███                 main 102  this  62   -40
  250-300 ms  █████░░░░░░░░░░░░┃        main  52  this 203  +151
  300-350 ms  ██████████████░░░░░┃      main 154  this 218   +64
  350-400 ms  █████████████████░░░░░░┃  main 193  this 267   +74
  400-450 ms  ███████░░░░░░░░░░┃        main  80  this 196  +116
  450-500 ms  ██┃████████               main 118  this  34   -84
  500-550 ms  ┃███████████              main 135  this   3  -132
  550-600 ms  ┃████                     main  61  this   1   -60
  600-650 ms  ┃█                        main  19  this   0   -19
  650-700 ms  ┃                         main  13  this   0   -13
  700-750 ms  ┃                         main   9  this   0    -9
  750-800 ms  ┃                         main   4  this   0    -4
  800-850 ms  ┃                         main   3  this   0    -3
  850-900 ms  ┃                         main   2  this   0    -2
 950-1000 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   0    -1
1200-1250 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   0    -1
3000-3050 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
3150-3200 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   0    -1
3600-3650 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   0    -1
3650-3700 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   0    -1

1020 steps (queue-hop)

Cumulative STSO time: 2325ms over 1 samples

No main baseline with raw samples yet — showing this run's distribution on its own; the diff appears once a run on main has recorded them.

2200-2400 ms  ████████████████████████  steps 1
📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)
variant  RTT 1ms→5s+             avg         p50         p90          p99     n
control  ······▇█▁····  106.7 (-56%)  100 (-35%)  155 (-85%)   269 (-82%)  3000
sweep    ······▇█▂▁▁··  142.3 (-32%)  102 (-22%)  388 (-49%)  1097 (-13%)  3000
gw 1x    ·····▁█▆▁▁···  104.4 (-20%)   97 (-16%)  151 (-22%)   649 (-26%)  5295
eve 1x   ·····▁█▆▁▁···  108.3 (-58%)   89 (-23%)  183 (-79%)   738 (-80%)  5186
eve 2x   ·····▁▅█▁▁···  120.9 (-55%)  112 (-36%)  180 (-73%)   362 (-81%)  7779

RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▆█▆▃▂▂▄▂▄▁  100–116ms
sweep    ▁▁▃▆█▇▅▁▁▁  106–209ms
gw 1x    ▁▃▂▁▃▂▁▂█▂  93–145ms
eve 1x   █▁▃▂▁▂▂▂▂▁  86–190ms
eve 2x   ▃▄▃▄▁▃▄█▄▄  97–155ms

RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max):

sweep  ▆██▄▁▂▃  139–145ms

Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▁█▆▄▄▃▆▆▅▂  28–40ms
sweep    ▁▄▄█▃▅▂▂▂▁  42–77ms
gw 1x    ▂█▄▁▆▅▄▆▆▆  25–35ms
eve 1x   █▁▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▄  21–37ms
eve 2x   ▃▃▁▄▃▅▅▆▂█  21–33ms
📜 Previous results (1)

83a5811

Sat, 15 Aug 2026 04:04:56 GMT · run logs

vercel / nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 1284 (+466%) 🔻 1464 🔴 (+28%) 🔻 1485 🔴 (+23%) 🔻 1792 🔴 (+32%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 202 (-14%) 1458 🔴 (+22%) 🔻 1467 🔴 (+16%) 🔻 1533 🔴 (+13%) 30
TTFS hook + stream 1562 (+275%) 🔻 1725 🔴 (+21%) 🔻 1770 🔴 (+22%) 🔻 1938 🔴 (+25%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 1070 (-19%) 💚 2732 (+6.2%) 2837 (+5.0%) 3042 (-5.0%) 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 10158 (-6.5%) 12315 (-89%) 💚 12919 (-93%) 💚 15274 (-92%) 💚 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 112 (-27%) 💚 290 (-42%) 💚 339 (-39%) 💚 486 (-38%) 💚 1019
WO 1020 steps 250532 (-40%) 💚 250532 (-40%) 💚 250532 (-40%) 💚 250532 (-40%) 💚 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 74 (-24%) 💚 108 (-30%) 💚 156 (-34%) 💚 250 (-13%) 28

Streams

Scenario wr c/s rd c/s wr KiB/s rd KiB/s CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 100 (±0%) 101 (-1%) 5 (±0%) 5.1 (±0%) 102 (-24%) 110 (-63%) 155 (-85%) 322 (-78%) 91 (-56%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 100 (±0%) 101 (+1%) 334 (±0%) 335 (+1%) 94.5 (-19%) 121 (-65%) 170 (-78%) 520 (-59%) 110 (-65%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 89.2 (±0%) 89.2 (±0%) 16.2 (±0%) 16.2 (-1%) 111 (+11%) 105 (-25%) 134 (-31%) 306 (-65%) 132 (-64%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 54.7 (±0%) 54.7 (±0%) 355 (±0%) 355 (±0%) 97 (-42%) 114 (-36%) 150 (-82%) 335 (-91%) 299 (-85%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 109 (±0%) 110 (+1%) 710 (±0%) 712 (+1%) 102 (-19%) 121 (-58%) 171 (-75%) 362 (-81%) 248 (-75%) 3
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodology

Streams: writer/reader sustained rates (steady window, 10% trimmed each side), first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach.

The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). = main, = this run, = fill.

The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, · = empty) and mean RTT/positive-CDV profile lines over stream progress and chunk size. Histograms, avgs, and profiles merge exactly across runs; p50–p99 are percentile-of-percentiles. Per-index rows live in the artifacts.

Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run. 🔻 flags a delta worse than +15%, 💚 one better than −15%.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it)

Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles

Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t eaf22f5946e7c61f3c65c7006d550df180cfabd4e706254a09f22aec0cfb420d · gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t 6f24ac518b6b83ff1d0e85a5fe78230db192716d66a7fc6b2fe022752001d041

🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600

All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = start() → first step body (includes dispatch + any cold start); Fan-out TTFS/TTLS = first/last step completion of one Promise.all from the same anchor (the gap is the runtime’s fan-out spread); STSO/WO between step bodies; CRTT inside the workflow (excludes the api.vercel.com read path).

Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sim World

Simulated world deterministic testing for races. Traces

🟠 Mint-ordered log — 3 fail of 41 total

log=mint-ordered · fence=per-spec

scenario outcome events virt replay violations
smoke-no-steps completed 3 0ms ok 0
smoke-one-step completed 6 0ms ok 0
hook-at-step-started completed 12 0ms ok 0
hook-at-step-completed completed 12 0ms ok 0
hook-at-hook-created completed 12 0ms ok 0
deadline-hook-wins completed 7 1.0h ok 0
deadline-expires completed 7 1.0h ok 0
long-sleep completed 11 30.0d ok 0
hook-never-arrives stalled 3 0ms skipped 0
step-retries-twice completed 10 2.0s ok 0
parallel-steps completed 9 0ms ok 0
hook-on-execution-state completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-before-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-after-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-at-registration completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-hook-before-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-hook-after-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-duplicate-delivery completed 13 0ms ok 0
attr-hook-before-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
attr-hook-after-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
attr-from-step-body completed 13 0ms ok 0
fork-hook-after-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
fork-hook-before-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
count-hook-after-timeout completed 17 1.0m ok 0
count-hook-before-timeout completed 20 1.0m ok 0
stale-read-step-count-fork completed 20 1.0m ok 0
stale-read-equal-step-counts completed 14 1.0m ok 0
step-vs-step-fork completed 12 0ms ok 0
step-vs-step-fork-fenced completed 12 0ms ok 0
fence-catches-benign-direction completed 12 5ms ok 0
in-flight-before-decision failed 9 1.0m MISMATCH 1
in-flight-before-decision-counted failed 9 1.0m MISMATCH 1
in-flight-after-decision failed 9 1.0m MISMATCH 1
stale-read-step-count-fork-fenced completed 20 1.0m ok 0
fork-hook-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
fork-timeout-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
unclaimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
claimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
writers-independent-step-bodies completed 12 0ms ok 0
writers-scripted-tempo completed 12 0ms ok 0
cancel-mid-step cancelled 7 0ms skipped 0

Full trace: world-sim-mint.txt

🟢 Append-only log — 0 fail of 41 total

log=append-only · fence=per-spec

scenario outcome events virt replay violations
smoke-no-steps completed 3 0ms ok 0
smoke-one-step completed 6 0ms ok 0
hook-at-step-started completed 12 0ms ok 0
hook-at-step-completed completed 12 0ms ok 0
hook-at-hook-created completed 12 0ms ok 0
deadline-hook-wins completed 7 1.0h ok 0
deadline-expires completed 7 1.0h ok 0
long-sleep completed 11 30.0d ok 0
hook-never-arrives stalled 3 0ms skipped 0
step-retries-twice completed 10 2.0s ok 0
parallel-steps completed 9 0ms ok 0
hook-on-execution-state completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-before-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-after-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-at-registration completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-hook-before-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-hook-after-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-duplicate-delivery completed 13 0ms ok 0
attr-hook-before-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
attr-hook-after-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
attr-from-step-body completed 13 0ms ok 0
fork-hook-after-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
fork-hook-before-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
count-hook-after-timeout completed 17 1.0m ok 0
count-hook-before-timeout completed 20 1.0m ok 0
stale-read-step-count-fork completed 20 1.0m ok 0
stale-read-equal-step-counts completed 14 1.0m ok 0
step-vs-step-fork completed 12 0ms ok 0
step-vs-step-fork-fenced completed 12 0ms ok 0
fence-catches-benign-direction completed 12 5ms ok 0
in-flight-before-decision completed 17 1.0m ok 0
in-flight-before-decision-counted completed 17 1.0m ok 0
in-flight-after-decision completed 19 2.0m ok 0
stale-read-step-count-fork-fenced completed 20 1.0m ok 0
fork-hook-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
fork-timeout-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
unclaimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
claimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
writers-independent-step-bodies completed 12 0ms ok 0
writers-scripted-tempo completed 12 0ms ok 0
cancel-mid-step cancelled 7 0ms skipped 0

Full trace: world-sim-append-only.txt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant