Add PiecewiseSequence take microbenchmarks by danking · Pull Request #8830 · vortex-data/vortex

Performance Gate Passed

✅ 1788 untouched benchmarks
🆕 39 new benchmarks
⏩ 54 skipped benchmarks¹

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
🆕	Simulation	`optimized_constant_lengths[1]`	N/A	427.3 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`optimized_constant_lengths[16]`	N/A	102.3 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`optimized_constant_lengths[256]`	N/A	87.6 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`optimized_constant_lengths[4]`	N/A	149.5 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`optimized_constant_lengths[64]`	N/A	89.9 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`prebuilt_dense_lengths[1]`	N/A	456.9 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`prebuilt_dense_lengths[16]`	N/A	103.7 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`prebuilt_dense_lengths[256]`	N/A	87.5 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`prebuilt_dense_lengths[4]`	N/A	156.5 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`prebuilt_dense_lengths[64]`	N/A	90 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`reify_constant_lengths_then_take[1]`	N/A	471.6 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`reify_constant_lengths_then_take[16]`	N/A	110.2 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`reify_constant_lengths_then_take[256]`	N/A	93.5 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`reify_constant_lengths_then_take[4]`	N/A	163.3 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`reify_constant_lengths_then_take[64]`	N/A	96.4 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`cursor_copy_safe[1000]`	N/A	6.9 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`cursor_copy_safe[10000]`	N/A	14.2 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`cursor_copy_safe[100000]`	N/A	86.6 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`extend_safe[1000]`	N/A	7.4 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`extend_safe[10000]`	N/A	14 µs	N/A
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

_{Comparing codex/piecewise-sequence-benchmarks (c731e4f) with develop (ae9ecec)}

54 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩